Check
Beseam runs the buying questions your customers actually ask against the assistants they use, and records what each answer says about your products.
Answer visibility, fixed at the product level
Beseam runs those questions against ChatGPT, Copilot, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, names the product field that left you out, publishes the fix to your store with one-click revert, then checks again to confirm the answer changed.
A real store, scanned with this form
Example scan, real result
A dancewear store
Shopify · scanned with this form
Answer visibility score
20/ 100Weak
Question by question
“What dance shoes are best for beginners?”
“Leather or suede dance shoes: which is better for dancing?”
“Where can I buy quality dance shoes online if I already know my size?”
“Where can I buy dance shoes in Switzerland?”
“What dance shoes are a good gift for a social dancer?”
Who takes the answers you lose
The unedited output of one real scan: the store's own buying questions, both assistants, and who got named instead. Enter your domain to get yours.
Diagnose — the field behind the miss
real audit
Low-Top Dance Sneakers (Rosé Gold)
This store · 130.00 CHF
Answer-readiness score
31/100 · F
27 of 81 checks failed. PDP audit, run on the live product page.
offers.availability
The Offer schema and the visible stock message don't resolve to the same status — assistants drop products they can't confirm as buyable.
offers.priceCurrency
Currency isn't explicit in both the visible price and the Offer schema.
offers.shippingDetails
No OfferShippingDetails in the Offer schema — required for shipping annotations in Google Search.
BreadcrumbList
No breadcrumb schema — the category hierarchy is invisible to AI engines.
The unedited output of one real audit of this product's live page — the same engine that runs inside the loop.
Fix — one field, publishable
proposed
Low-Top Dance Sneakers (Rosé Gold)
This store · 130.00 CHF
Also queued from this audit
offers.priceCurrency
Declare the currency in the Offer schema and show it with the visible price.
offers.shippingDetails
Add OfferShippingDetails JSON-LD (rate and delivery time) so shipping annotations can show.
BreadcrumbList
Add BreadcrumbList schema so the category path is machine-readable.
Every change from the audit is queued as its own proposed action — approved, published and reverted one field at a time.
Verify — the answer is the proof
after publish
Low-Top Dance Sneakers (Rosé Gold)
This store · 130.00 CHF
What dance shoes are best for beginners?
Good question — it depends mostly on the style you're starting with:
If you're not sure which style will stick, a low-top dance sneaker is the safest first pair — comfortable, flexible, and it works across styles. A few options that come up often:
Low-Top Dance Sneakers (Rosé Gold)This store · 130.00 CHFyoursWhichever you pick, prioritise fit and a sole that matches your dance floor — you can always specialise once you know your style.
After the fix publishes, the same question is asked again on a schedule. The answer changing — not the edit — is the proof.
Questions are asked against
Visibility is not one number. The same catalog can win ChatGPT and lose Claude on the same day, for different reasons — and the reason decides the fix. This is a real merchant’s window, exactly as the product shows it.
you 81% · rival 19%+62
you 77% · rival 17%+60
you 70% · rival 21%+49
you 6% · rival 8%−2
Fewer than half of Claude's answers named any brand at all — an answer-data gap, not a competitor win. The fix is product data, not marketing.
Not measured Microsoft Copilot — no completed checks in this window. Shown as absent, never as 0%.
Reporting tools stop after the first step and hand you a score. Beseam carries the same question through to a published change and a re-check, so you find out whether the fix worked.
Beseam runs the buying questions your customers actually ask against the assistants they use, and records what each answer says about your products.
Each miss is traced to the product data behind it: an absent spec, a price that disagrees with your feed, a variant out of stock. Ranked by sessions and revenue at risk, not by score.
Beseam proposes the exact field change. With your approval and store access, it publishes to your store and keeps a snapshot, so one click puts the old value back.
The same question is run again after the change, and the result is recorded against the product, so you can see whether the answer moved.
One buying question, one product, one field. The evidence, the proposed change, the approval, and the re-check stay attached to the same product record.

A product stays active in your store while disappearing from the places customers actually decide. The cause is usually one field: a missing spec, a price that disagrees with itself, a variant marked out of stock. Beseam names the field.
A buying question that used to return your product now returns someone else's, or nothing useful.
The feed says one price, the product page says another. Channels and assistants drop the product rather than guess.
Size, fit, material, compatibility. If the field is not in your product data, the product cannot match the question.
Still active in your store, gone from a channel your customers use, with no notification anywhere.
Beseam also runs the sessions on your storefront, so a finding carries the traffic and revenue behind it. The work queue is ordered by what the miss costs you, not by a severity label.

Most visibility tools round their uncertainty away. Three rules keep our numbers honest:
An engine we did not check this window shows as not measured. A 0% always means we asked, and your product was absent from the answer.
Share of answers means share of that engine’s completed checks in the window — and the window is printed next to the number.
When an engine names no brands at all, we say so. That is a product-data fix, not a marketing fight — and it comes first.
The loop, compared
| Step | Reporting tools | An agency retainer | Beseam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Check | A score, refreshed on a schedule | A quarterly audit | Continuous, per prompt, per engine |
| Diagnose | To a list of cited domains | To a slide deck | To the product field behind the miss |
| Fix | — | A ticket for your team | Published to your store, revertible |
| Check again | — | Next quarter’s report | The same question, run again |
During an agreed pilot, Beseam must establish the product baseline, monitor the agreed discovery paths, identify a material visibility issue, and show the evidence and proposed fix. If we cannot, the engagement ends and you owe us nothing.
Enter your store domain. We ask the buying questions for your category and send you the products that were left out, with the field behind each miss.
Clear answers about baselines, change alerts, commercial priority, approvals, and recovery checks.
Beseam monitors agreed products across the store catalog, product pages, shopping feeds, search results, and product recommendations. It keeps those sources attached to the same product record so each run can be compared with the previous state.
The first monitoring run establishes a baseline for the agreed products and discovery paths. Later runs compare product presence, title, price, availability, description, structured data, language coverage, and other source evidence with that baseline and the most recent known state.
Examples include a product leaving a shopping feed, disappearing from a tracked search or buying answer, being replaced by a competitor, or showing product facts that no longer agree with the store catalog. Beseam keeps the source and time of the change with the product.
Beseam considers the commercial priority available for the product, the number and importance of affected discovery paths, the freshness and quality of the evidence, and the scope agreed with the store. High-selling or high-priority products can be placed ahead of minor catalog warnings.
The monitoring cadence depends on the source and the agreed scope. Each result records when the source was checked and whether the evidence is fresh, stale, incomplete, or unavailable, so an old result does not appear current.
No. Your commerce platform remains the source for catalog and order data, and each channel keeps its own records. Beseam compares those sources over time and points your team to the product-level change that needs attention.
The alert includes the affected product, the previous and current state, the source evidence, the likely cause, and a proposed next step. The owner and approval stay attached to the product, and Beseam reruns the original check after the change.
No material customer-facing change is published without the access and approval rules agreed for the store. Your team can approve, reject, or edit a proposed change before anything is published.
During an agreed pilot, if Beseam cannot establish the product baseline, monitor the agreed discovery paths, identify a material visibility issue, and show the evidence and proposed fix within 30 days, you owe us nothing and the engagement ends. The agreed store and data access must remain available during the pilot.