Skip to content

Answer visibility, fixed at the product level

When a shopper asks what to buy, your product should be the answer.

Beseam runs those questions against ChatGPT, Copilot, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, names the product field that left you out, publishes the fix to your store with one-click revert, then checks again to confirm the answer changed.

Check
The assistants your buyers use
Fix
Published to your store, revertible
Check again
Same question, run again

We read your live storefront first. Email is optional: add it and we send a link that runs the assistant questions.

A real store, scanned with this form

01Checkreal scan

Example scan, real result

A dancewear store

Shopify · scanned with this form

Answer visibility score

20/ 100Weak

Named you
2 of 10 answers
Questions asked
5
Assistants
ChatGPT, Google AI Mode
Rivals named instead
17

Question by question

  • What dance shoes are best for beginners?

    ChatGPTdid not name youGoogle AI Modedid not name youNamed instead BLOCH Dance US, GetDancewear, Discount Dance, Junction Dance Boutique
  • Leather or suede dance shoes: which is better for dancing?

    ChatGPTdid not name youGoogle AI Modedid not name youNamed instead Bloch Dance US, Capezio, Amazon
  • Where can I buy quality dance shoes online if I already know my size?

    ChatGPTdid not name youGoogle AI Modedid not name youNamed instead Capezio, Bloch, Discount Dance Supply, BallroomShoes.com
  • Where can I buy dance shoes in Switzerland?

    ChatGPTnamed youGoogle AI Modenamed you
  • What dance shoes are a good gift for a social dancer?

    ChatGPTdid not name youGoogle AI Modedid not name youNamed instead Very Fine Dance Shoes, Bloch Dance US, DanceOutfitters, Fuego

Who takes the answers you lose

  • Bloch4×
  • Capezio3×
  • Discount Dance2×
  • Fuego1×
  • Amazon1×
  • DanceBro1×

The unedited output of one real scan: the store's own buying questions, both assistants, and who got named instead. Enter your domain to get yours.

02Diagnosereal audit

Diagnose — the field behind the miss

real audit

Low-Top Dance Sneakers (Rosé Gold)

This store · 130.00 CHF

Answer-readiness score

31/100 · F

27 of 81 checks failed. PDP audit, run on the live product page.

  • blocker

    offers.availability

    The Offer schema and the visible stock message don't resolve to the same status — assistants drop products they can't confirm as buyable.

  • high

    offers.priceCurrency

    Currency isn't explicit in both the visible price and the Offer schema.

  • high

    offers.shippingDetails

    No OfferShippingDetails in the Offer schema — required for shipping annotations in Google Search.

  • low

    BreadcrumbList

    No breadcrumb schema — the category hierarchy is invisible to AI engines.

The unedited output of one real audit of this product's live page — the same engine that runs inside the loop.

03Fixproposed

Fix — one field, publishable

proposed

Low-Top Dance Sneakers (Rosé Gold)

This store · 130.00 CHF

proposed change · offers.availabilityProduct page template
<p class="product-price">CHF 130.00</p>
(no visible stock status on the page)
+<p class="stock-status">In stock — ready to ship</p>
"availability": "https://schema.org/InStock" ✓ unchanged
awaiting approval · nothing ships without it

Also queued from this audit

  • high

    offers.priceCurrency

    Declare the currency in the Offer schema and show it with the visible price.

    proposed
  • high

    offers.shippingDetails

    Add OfferShippingDetails JSON-LD (rate and delivery time) so shipping annotations can show.

    proposed
  • low

    BreadcrumbList

    Add BreadcrumbList schema so the category path is machine-readable.

    proposed

Every change from the audit is queued as its own proposed action — approved, published and reverted one field at a time.

04Check againafter publish

Verify — the answer is the proof

after publish

Low-Top Dance Sneakers (Rosé Gold)

This store · 130.00 CHF

ChatGPTAfter the fix publishes

What dance shoes are best for beginners?

Good question — it depends mostly on the style you're starting with:

  • Ballet soft canvas or leather slippers with a full or split sole.
  • Ballroom & Latin a low-heeled practice shoe with a suede sole, so you can pivot without sticking.
  • Salsa & social dancing dance sneakers or suede-sole shoes — the most forgiving choice for long social nights.
  • Hip-hop & studio classes lightweight dance sneakers with a pivot spot under the ball of the foot.

If you're not sure which style will stick, a low-top dance sneaker is the safest first pair — comfortable, flexible, and it works across styles. A few options that come up often:

  1. 1.Low-Top Dance Sneakers (Rosé Gold)This store · 130.00 CHFyours
  2. 2.Performa Stretch Canvas Split Sole Ballet ShoeBLOCH Dance US · 24.00 USD
  3. 3.Elasta Bootie Jazz Shoe (S0499L)GetDancewear · 57.50 USD
  4. 4.Cadence Tap Shoe (CG19)Capezio · 98.50 USD

Whichever you pick, prioritise fit and a sole that matches your dance floor — you can always specialise once you know your style.

After the fix publishes, the same question is asked again on a schedule. The answer changing — not the edit — is the proof.

Questions are asked against

  • ChatGPT
  • Google AI Mode
  • Google Shopping
  • Gemini
  • Microsoft Copilot
  • Perplexity
  • Claude
  • Alexa Shopping
  • Shopify catalog
  • Your product pages and feeds

The same product, engine by engine.

Visibility is not one number. The same catalog can win ChatGPT and lose Claude on the same day, for different reasons — and the reason decides the fix. This is a real merchant’s window, exactly as the product shows it.

Share of answers naming the brandyouclosest competitor
ChatGPT

you 81% · rival 19%+62

Gemini

you 77% · rival 17%+60

Google AI Mode

you 70% · rival 21%+49

Claude

you 6% · rival 8%2

Fewer than half of Claude's answers named any brand at all — an answer-data gap, not a competitor win. The fix is product data, not marketing.

Not measured Microsoft Copilot — no completed checks in this window. Shown as absent, never as 0%.

Fig. 1 — engine gapsOne dancewear merchant, 30 days of real shopper prompts. Each percentage is the share of that engine’s completed answers that named the brand. Competitor names withheld.

Check. Diagnose. Fix. Check again.

Reporting tools stop after the first step and hand you a score. Beseam carries the same question through to a published change and a re-check, so you find out whether the fix worked.

01

Check

Beseam runs the buying questions your customers actually ask against the assistants they use, and records what each answer says about your products.

02

Diagnose

Each miss is traced to the product data behind it: an absent spec, a price that disagrees with your feed, a variant out of stock. Ranked by sessions and revenue at risk, not by score.

03

Fix

Beseam proposes the exact field change. With your approval and store access, it publishes to your store and keeps a snapshot, so one click puts the old value back.

04

Check again

The same question is run again after the change, and the result is recorded against the product, so you can see whether the answer moved.

Nothing customer-facing is published without your access and your approval. Every published change keeps the previous value, so it can be reverted in one click.

From a missed answer to a published fix.

One buying question, one product, one field. The evidence, the proposed change, the approval, and the re-check stay attached to the same product record.

Checked
Record the answer and whether the product was named.
Diagnosed
Name the product field that caused the miss, and the revenue behind it.
Published
Write the approved change to the store, keeping the old value.
Checked again
Re-run the same question and record whether the answer moved.
A Beseam product workflow moving from evidence to a proposed change and verification
Product workflowThe finding, proposed change, approval, and verification stay attached to one product.

If AI can’t find the answer, it names someone else.

A product stays active in your store while disappearing from the places customers actually decide. The cause is usually one field: a missing spec, a price that disagrees with itself, a variant marked out of stock. Beseam names the field.

The answer names a competitor

A buying question that used to return your product now returns someone else's, or nothing useful.

Your price disagrees with itself

The feed says one price, the product page says another. Channels and assistants drop the product rather than guess.

The spec buyers ask for is missing

Size, fit, material, compatibility. If the field is not in your product data, the product cannot match the question.

The product left a shopping feed

Still active in your store, gone from a channel your customers use, with no notification anywhere.

Fix the products that cost you the most.

Beseam also runs the sessions on your storefront, so a finding carries the traffic and revenue behind it. The work queue is ordered by what the miss costs you, not by a severity label.

  • Sessions, funnels, and replay on the same products
  • Answer history: where the product appeared before and now
  • Revenue at risk, kept separate from modelled numbers
  • Owner, proposed field change, approval, and re-check
Beseam product record showing catalog, visibility, and commercial information
Persistent product recordCatalog details, answer evidence, sessions, and open work stay attached to the same product.

What the score doesn’t say.

Most visibility tools round their uncertainty away. Three rules keep our numbers honest:

Unmeasured is never zero

An engine we did not check this window shows as not measured. A 0% always means we asked, and your product was absent from the answer.

Every percentage states its denominator

Share of answers means share of that engine’s completed checks in the window — and the window is printed next to the number.

Losing and being unreadable are different problems

When an engine names no brands at all, we say so. That is a product-data fix, not a marketing fight — and it comes first.

The loop, compared

StepReporting toolsAn agency retainerBeseam
CheckA score, refreshed on a scheduleA quarterly auditContinuous, per prompt, per engine
DiagnoseTo a list of cited domainsTo a slide deckTo the product field behind the miss
FixA ticket for your teamPublished to your store, revertible
Check againNext quarter’s reportThe same question, run again

If we cannot set up useful product visibility monitoring in 30 days, you pay nothing.

During an agreed pilot, Beseam must establish the product baseline, monitor the agreed discovery paths, identify a material visibility issue, and show the evidence and proposed fix. If we cannot, the engagement ends and you owe us nothing.

You receive
A monitored product scope, baseline, alert evidence, and proposed fix
We recheck
The original visibility signal after your team makes the change
The boundary
We promise useful monitoring and diagnosis, not a sales increase
What we need
The agreed store and data access available during the pilot
Book a 20-minute review

Find out what the assistants say about your products.

Enter your store domain. We ask the buying questions for your category and send you the products that were left out, with the field behind each miss.

Free scan of your live catalog. No store access needed to see the first findings.

Want the publishing and monitoring loop set up on your store?Book a 20-minute review
The scan reads public pages only. Beseam does not publish customer-facing changes without the agreed store access and your approval.

Questions about monitoring product visibility.

Clear answers about baselines, change alerts, commercial priority, approvals, and recovery checks.

What does Beseam monitor?

Beseam monitors agreed products across the store catalog, product pages, shopping feeds, search results, and product recommendations. It keeps those sources attached to the same product record so each run can be compared with the previous state.

How does Beseam know that product visibility changed?

The first monitoring run establishes a baseline for the agreed products and discovery paths. Later runs compare product presence, title, price, availability, description, structured data, language coverage, and other source evidence with that baseline and the most recent known state.

What counts as a product visibility change?

Examples include a product leaving a shopping feed, disappearing from a tracked search or buying answer, being replaced by a competitor, or showing product facts that no longer agree with the store catalog. Beseam keeps the source and time of the change with the product.

How does Beseam decide which alert matters first?

Beseam considers the commercial priority available for the product, the number and importance of affected discovery paths, the freshness and quality of the evidence, and the scope agreed with the store. High-selling or high-priority products can be placed ahead of minor catalog warnings.

How often does Beseam check the catalog?

The monitoring cadence depends on the source and the agreed scope. Each result records when the source was checked and whether the evidence is fresh, stale, incomplete, or unavailable, so an old result does not appear current.

Does Beseam replace Shopify or our feed tools?

No. Your commerce platform remains the source for catalog and order data, and each channel keeps its own records. Beseam compares those sources over time and points your team to the product-level change that needs attention.

What happens after Beseam raises an alert?

The alert includes the affected product, the previous and current state, the source evidence, the likely cause, and a proposed next step. The owner and approval stay attached to the product, and Beseam reruns the original check after the change.

Can Beseam publish product changes without approval?

No material customer-facing change is published without the access and approval rules agreed for the store. Your team can approve, reject, or edit a proposed change before anything is published.

What is the first-month promise?

During an agreed pilot, if Beseam cannot establish the product baseline, monitor the agreed discovery paths, identify a material visibility issue, and show the evidence and proposed fix within 30 days, you owe us nothing and the engagement ends. The agreed store and data access must remain available during the pilot.